good whiteness tio2 rutile for exterior wall coating manufacturers
However, the journey hasn't been without challenges. Environmental concerns, stringent regulations, and fluctuations in raw material prices have posed hurdles for the industry Environmental concerns, stringent regulations, and fluctuations in raw material prices have posed hurdles for the industry
Our extensive network of consultants, raw material suppliers, machinery suppliers and subject matter experts spans over 100+ countries across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, Africa, and the Middle East.
%
In conclusion, titanium dioxide is an integral part of coatings factories, transforming the quality and functionality of coatings. Its role as a pigment not only adds aesthetic appeal but also provides crucial protection against environmental factors. As technology advances, the coatings industry will likely continue to harness the full potential of TiO2, ensuring its continued dominance in the sector.
Goshorn, J.H.; Black, C.K. (1929). The study of lithopone darkening. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 21 (4): 348–9. doi:10.1021/ie50232a021.
On November 23, 2022, the General Court of the European Union reversed the conclusion that titanium dioxide was carcinogenic and released a statement (1,2):
“First, the Commission made a manifest error in its assessment of the reliability and acceptability of the study on which the classification was based and, second, it infringed the criterion according to which that classification can relate only to a substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer.”
As part of our mission at CRIS we base our safety assessments on the currently available scientific evidence and consider many variables (e.g., study quality, journal of publication, etc.), even if it goes against previous conclusions. Evidence-informed decisions making is critical to ensure that the laws and regulations put into place are for the benefit of the population.
The EU General Court maintains that the scientific evidence presented wasn’t the complete picture for the ingredient, “in the present case, the requirement to base the classification of a carcinogenic substance on reliable and acceptable studies was not satisfied.”
“First, the Commission made a manifest error in its assessment of the reliability and acceptability of the study on which the classification was based and, second, it infringed the criterion according to which that classification can relate only to a substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer.”
As part of our mission at CRIS we base our safety assessments on the currently available scientific evidence and consider many variables (e.g., study quality, journal of publication, etc.), even if it goes against previous conclusions. Evidence-informed decisions making is critical to ensure that the laws and regulations put into place are for the benefit of the population.
The EU General Court maintains that the scientific evidence presented wasn’t the complete picture for the ingredient, “in the present case, the requirement to base the classification of a carcinogenic substance on reliable and acceptable studies was not satisfied.”